BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH FOR FEE, PRICING & POLICY CHANGES

You bring the policy change. We find the breaking point.

We turn your proposed fee, rule or policy into a playable scenario, run it past a screened panel, and tell you where people accept, object, negotiate or walk — in three weeks, before a single customer sees it.

30 minutes with the people who build the scenarios. No deck, no pitch — we'll tell you if we're the wrong tool.

See what's in a Decision Readout

From decision to evidence

Client decision
Interactive scenario
Participant choices
FrictionIQ
Response patterns
Top objections
Accepted trade-offs
Decision report
Acceptancethresholds
Objectionlanguage
Negotiationpaths
Walk-awaypoints
3,218 real decisions recordedPre-registered rules, published exclusionsLive in property & collections
90-second overview

Scenario spec to Decision Readout, in three weeks.

Watch FrictionIQ in Action

How It Works

From proposed changeto Decision Readout.

Four steps. One 60-minute call to start. Three weeks to a Decision Readout.

STEP 01

Define the decision.

One 60-minute call: what you're proposing, what the alternatives are, and what this evidence will actually change.

If it's already signed off, we'll say so and decline.

STEP 02

Build the scenario.

Your change becomes a playable situation with real costs and trade-offs — usually 2–4 variants, so we measure differences, not reactions.

You sign off the spec and the decision rules before launch.

STEP 03

Field it.

Public community, screened private panel, or both. Exclusions are applied and reported.

Every choice, objection and walk-away is logged.

STEP 04

Read out.

The Decision Readout, the raw data, and an hour with the people who built it.

Your findings and identity stay yours.

Live Proof of Concept

Property Tribunal: proof that a vertical can be mapped.

A live scenario where people work through real property disputes — deposit deductions, repair standoffs, fee changes, renewal terms. The working template for every vertical we open next.

Three escalating stages — one vertical fully mapped

The Negotiator · The Mediator · The Adjudicator

  1. STAGE 01

    The Negotiator

    Settle directly. Participants can concede, hold out, counter-offer, or escalate.

  2. STAGE 02

    The Mediator

    Bring in a third party. Structured compromise with a new authority dynamic.

  3. STAGE 03

    The Adjudicator

    Accept a binding ruling — or leave. Terminal stage; all choices logged.

See the live scenario

Play through a property dispute

Nothing lands like making the choice yourself. You'll understand the instrument in 30 seconds — and see why participants stay to the final stage.

Play the live scenario
What You Receive

The Decision Readout.Not a dashboard. A document your exec team acts on in one meeting.

Three weeks from scenario sign-off. Ten sections, the raw CSV, and a five-slide exec cut built to be forwarded without us in the room.

FrictionIQ Decision Readout

What every Decision Readout contains

Findings vary by engagement; the structure doesn't

Structure shown · findings are client-confidential
Threshold curves
Objection map
Negotiation paths
Escalation analysis
Method & limits

01Threshold curves

Where acceptance breaks down across each version of your change — and how steeply.

02The Objection Map

Every objection raised, coded and ranked, in participants' own words. The section clients quote back most.

03Negotiation paths

What people asked for instead, which counter-offers ended the dispute, and which made it worse.

04Escalation & abandonment

The exact points where people stopped negotiating and either escalated or left.

05Exec cut + raw CSV

Five slides built to be forwarded without us in the room, plus every recorded choice so your analysts can check our work.

Also included: Trade-off ranking · Segment cuts (or an explicit note where a segment is too small) · Method & limitations appendix · Sector context, where available

Every readout includes a section titled “What we would not conclude from this data.” We sell directional evidence, not prediction or a population estimate — and we say so in writing.

Replay Simulator

Test ten variations without running ten studies.

Once we've recorded how real people respond to your scenario, we can replay those decisions against alternative fees, notice periods and concessions — instantly, without going back to the panel. No synthetic respondents. No LLM guessing.

1. Record

Real choices from real participants in your scenario.

2. Replay

Change the fee, the timing, the wording. See how recorded decisions shift.

3. Flag

Variants that raise dispute rates are flagged before they reach your readout.

Industries We Map

Industries We Map.Most vendors list twelve. Here's the actual state of play.

Each sector is labelled by what we can deliver today — not what we'd like to.

Live now

Property, Lettings & Residential Disputes

Deposits, repairs, fee introductions, renewals. If your change touches tenants, landlords or agents, the scenario library and panel exist today.

Read the 2026 Property Friction Map →

Fees, Arrears & Collections

A demand, an authority imbalance, and a customer deciding whether to pay, push back or escalate. Late fees, arrears, forbearance, hardship routing.

Scope a collections scenario →
Built to order
By commission

Insurance

Excess changes, claims evidence, renewal increases, appeals. Built and recruited to order.

By commission

Subscription & SaaS Pricing

Plan migrations, grandfathering, usage caps, cancellation flows. Private panel.

Private only

HR & Workplace Policy

Return-to-office, benefits changes, restructuring. Run inside your own workforce.

Not yet: Healthcare, clinical pathways, or anything a regulator must accept. The instrument isn't ready.

Where It Fits

What we're better at —and what we're worse at.

Pick the method by the question, not by habit. We've marked the row we lose.

CapabilitySurvey / conjointFocus groupLive pilot / A/BShip it anywayFrictionIQ scenario
What you observeStated intentDiscussion, room-influencedReal behaviour, in marketThe aftermath
Choices under rules, costs and consequences
Acceptance thresholdsModelledNoEventuallyRetrospectively
By design
The words people use to objectRarelyYes, n=8NoIn your complaints queue
Yes, at scale
Negotiation & escalation behaviourNoSimulated at bestOnly after damageOnly after damage
Core output
Time to evidence4–8 weeks3–5 weeks1–2 quarters0
3 weeks
Population-representative estimatesBest in classNoYesn/a
No — we don't claim this
Exposure if change lands badlyNoneNoneReal customers, real churnMaximum
Contained
Best forSizing a known questionUnderstanding whyConfirming at scaleNothing
Deciding what to ship, before you ship it

Know where the line is before your customers find it.

One 60-minute call. Three weeks. A readout your exec team acts on in one meeting. Fixed fee, agreed at scoping.

Book a 30-min scoping call

No deck, no pitch — we'll tell you if we're the wrong tool.